Alcedo Orange Ltd v Ferridge-Gunn (2023)

ET decision that the claimant was subject to pregnancy discrimination has been held to be "unsafe" by the EAT due to an error in law, in that the ET failed to establish who the decision maker(s) were and whether the decision maker(s) were motivated by pregnancy discrimination "in accordance with the principles set out in" CLFIS (UK) Ltd v Reynolds (2015). The case has been remitted back to the ET.