|
|
 |
Site Map

Add Site To Favourites.
|
|
|
|
Employment Law Solicitors: Disability Discrimination Claims
|
| |
|
 |
Employment Law Solicitors:
Disability Discrimination Claims
The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) made it
unlawful to discriminate against disabled people in
employment. The legislation protects disabled
persons against the following: direct
discrimination, disability related discrimination
that cannot be justified, failure to carry out
reasonable adjustments, harassment, and
victimisation |
Direct Discrimination
This occurs where someone is treated less favourably than
someone else who is not disabled solely because of their
disability. There is no defence to this form of
discrimination.
Disability Related Discrimination That Cannot Be
Justified
This outlaws discrimination which occurs where someone is
treated less favourably due to a disability than others are
or would be treated to whom that reason does not or would
not apply, and where such treatment cannot be justified. The
burden to prove justification is on the employer but
discrimination would only be considered justifiable if "the
reason for it is both material to the circumstances of the
particular case and substantial". What is considered
material and substantial is a matter for the tribunal.
Failure To Carry Out Reasonable Adjustments
Under the DDA, employers must make reasonable adjustments
where a requirement or procedure and/or any aspect of their
premises, place a disabled person at a substantial
disadvantage in comparison with non-disabled persons. This
obligation only applies where the employer is either aware
of or reasonably ought to have been aware of the disabled
person's disability. Accordingly, disability discrimination
cannot be justified where a reasonable adjustment would have
prevented the discrimination from occurring. Whether an
adjustment is reasonable is determined by reference to its
effectiveness, its cost, the practicability of implementing
it, and the wealth and size of the employer. Employers can
obtain assistance to fund reasonable adjustments such as
under the Access To Work scheme and this must be taken into
account when determining whether a potential adjustment is
reasonable. Ignorance of sources of financial assistance is
no defence as a prudent employer would have been expected to
have made reasonable enquiries.
Harassment
This is defined as unwanted conduct that violates the
victims dignity or which creates an intimidating, hostile,
degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for them.
Victimisation
It is unlawful to treat a person less favourably because
they have made allegations or brought proceedings under the
DDA, or because they have helped another person to do so.
Bringing A Disability Discrimination Claim
A tribunal claim must be made within three months of the
discriminatory act (or last discriminatory act) complained
of. Before bringing the claim, the employee must set out
their grievance in writing to their employer and wait 28
days before commencing their tribunal claim. Unlike in
unfair dismissal claims, employees do not have to have had
at least 1 years continuous service with the employer to be
entitled to bring the claim. Should the employees claim be
successful, the tribunal can make recommendations and award
compensation. Should the employer fail to comply with
recommendations made by the tribunal for action to reduce
discrimination without reasonable justification, the
tribunal can award additional compensation on top of what it
may have already awarded. Compensation awards in
discrimination cases are unlimited and unlike in unfair
dismissal cases, there is no such thing as a 'basic' or
'compensatory' award. Instead, the award normally comprises
the following:-
-
Injury to Feelings: Comprise separate awards for
hurt feelings, aggravated damages, and injury to health.
The criteria for assessing compensation for hurt
feelings were set out by the Court of Appeal in the case
of Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (No.2)
(2003). In that case, the Court stated that there should
be a top band of between £15,000.00 and £25,000.00 for
the most serious cases, a middle band of between
£5,000.00 and £15,000.00 for serious cases, and awards
of between £500.00 and £5,000.00 for less serious and
one-off cases. The Court stated that awards of less than
£500.00 should be avoided. An injury to health claim can
be incorporated into the injury to feelings claim, but
should there be a separate award for it, the tribunal
has to ensure that there is no element of duplication.
Finally, aggravated damages can also be awarded as part
of the injury to feelings claim, although awards for
this element do not usually exceed £5,000.00 and are
only awarded should the employers conduct have been
especially cruel and malicious.
-
Loss of Earnings: Normally makes up the bulk of
the claim and includes both actual and future loss of
earnings. Future loss can be extensive where psychiatric
injury has been sustained as a result of the
discrimination and makes it difficult for the employee
to obtain new and appropriate employment.
-
Injury to Health (Personal Injury): Is most
commonly for psychiatric injury. Nevertheless, where a
claim for personal injury is included, the employee
loses the right to bring a claim in the civil courts
for it.
-
Ancillary Losses: These can be for items such as
the cost of looking for alternative employment and
pension loss.
-
Interest: Interest on the compensation award can
be claimed
|
The Employment Law
Solicitors, the brand, is part of Antrobus
Solicitors, a firm regulated by the Solicitors
Regulation Authority. Details of the
professional rules which regulate solicitors can
be found at the following website address:
http://www.rules.sra.org.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Employment Law Solicitors - handling cases nationwide:
Carlisle, Worcester, Durham, Lincoln, Hereford, Canterbury, Litchfield, Ripon,
Bangor, Wells, St. David's, Luton, Bedford, Bedfordshire, Berkshire,
Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Cumbria, Derbyshire, Dorset, Essex,
Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Herefordshire, Huntingdonshire, Kent, Leicestershire,
Lincolnshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Northamptonshire, Northumberland, Oxfordshire,
Rutland, Shropshire, Somerset, Suffolk, Sussex, Warwickshire, Westmoreland,
Wiltshire, Worcestershire, Reading, Newbury, Anglesey, Gwent, Clwyd, Gwynedd, Dyfed, Powys, Bath, Brighton, Cambridge, Oxford, Plymouth, Southampton, Stratford, York, Flintshire, Glamorgan, Cheltenham, Bradford, Wakefield, Coventry, Leicester, Sunderland, Hull, Stoke, Wolverhampton, Swansea, Salford, Ipswich, Portsmouth, Peterborough, Lancaster, Newport, Preston, St. Albans, Norwich, Chester, Salisbury, Exeter, Gloucester, Chichester, Winchester, Cleveland, Tyne and Wear, Cumberland, Northumbria, Wrexham, Cardiff, Manchester, Liverpool, London, Birmingham, Derby, Bradford, Cheshire, Lancashire, Yorkshire, Newcastle, Birmingham, Devon, Cornwall, Sheffield, Staffordshire, Leeds, Nottingham, Bristol, Crewe.
|
Home
|
site map |
news | news archive |
email | links | legal
disclaimer | contact |
Dismissal & Discrimination Claims
|
tribunal claims procedure |
unfair
dismissal claims | constructive
dismissal claims | wrongful dismissal claims |
| sex discrimination claims |
race discrimination
claims |
disability discrimination claims | age discrimination claims
|
Common Employment Law Issues |
compromise agreements | redundancy |
TUPE transfer of undertakings |
harassment | occupational stress
|
|
health and safety | equal pay | national minimum wage
|
working
time regulations |
unlawful deductions from wages |
recovering training fees |
|
maternity and paternity rights |
suspending employees | statutory
disciplinary procedures |
new package for
employers |
employing children |
| flexible working |
restrictive covenants |
sickness absence | spent convictions |
temporary workers |
breach of contract |
| the contract of employment
| variation of contract |
whistleblowing |
employment law claims - add url
© Copyright 2007 for The
Employment Law Solicitors by
Webspace Unlimited
|
|
|
| |